Manipulation in Potterverse and in general /Tigana spoilers

Carol justcarol67 at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 11 20:31:17 UTC 2008


No: HPFGUIDX 185151

Alla wrote:
> 
> Um, we know that Harry is wrong? Quite the contrary, I think he is 
> absolutely 100% dead on in the part that he thinks that Dumbledore 
> let him face Voldemort. I am completely unpersuaded by your proof, 
> because I do not see the relevance of your deduction and it is IMO 
> just a deduction. Why WOULD characters say that Dumbledore should 
> have known that Quirrell was possessed? How does it prove that 
> Dumbledore **did** not know?
<snip> But this is just an aside, as I said I believe Dumbledore 
> knowing full well, or highly suspecting what was happening is pretty 
> much canon.
> 
> Dumbledore tells Snape to keep an eye on Quirrell, does he not? Erm, 
> why would you think he takes such a special interest in him? I think 
> he strongly suspected that Quirrell is *up to something*, and yes, I 
> think up to something being Voldemort was at least among the 
> possibilities on his mind. <snip>

Carol responds:

First, I agree with you that Dumbledore knew Harry was going after the
Philosopher's Stone and not only didn't discourage him but to some
extent helped him (the Invisibility Cloak, the Mirror of Erised). He
did not, however, tell him everything he needed to know. He wanted
Harry and his friends to figure it out on their own and to be able to
survive the dangers they were facing. (I don't think that DD himself
specified the tasks; it was JKR who made sure that, for example, the
chess game matched Ron's one special talent!)

However, knowing that Quirrell was "up to something" (as DD obviously
did or he wouldn't have had Snape keep an eye on him) and suspecting
that he was stealing the Philosopher's Stone for Voldemort (as snape
obviously suspected or he wouldn't have talked about where Quirrell's
loyalties lie) isn't the same as knowing that Quirrell is possessed
(which Snape might or might not have found out through Legilimency).
DD would have had sufficient reason to be suspicious of Quirrell when
he came back from Albania(?) stammering and stuttering, perhaps no
longer willing to meet LV's eyes, and still more when he showed up for
the first day of class wearing that smelly turban. Since he hid the
stone at Hogwarts (mentioning the third-floor corridor at the opening
day banquet), it's obvious that he not only expected but *intended*
for Quirrell to try to steal the Stone. (Note that he is the only
teacher of the five key subjects taught to all students--Potions,
Transfiguration, charms, Herbology, and DADA--who was not asked to
help guard the Stone, along with the loyal Hagrid.)

What I don't understand is how DD knew that LV would attempt to steal
the Stone from Gringotts *before* Quirrell put on the turban. (LV
possessed him to "keep a closer eye" on him *after* he failed to steal
the Stone in the Gringotts break-in. It's the sort of thing that
misled many of us into thinking that DD was more or less omniscient.

Carol, who looked out her window Sunday morning expecting to see a dog
and instead saw a javelina (wild pig) in her yard! 






More information about the HPforGrownups archive