Legilimency without consent WAS: Obviously guilty

[nikkalmati]

No: HPFGUIDX 189672



 
> 
> Zanooda:
> At the very least, the eye contact is *very* important. Both DD and Snape legilimenced Harry in earlier books, because he didn't know what they were doing, otherwise he would have just avoided their probing gaze. 
> 
> 
> Alla:
> 
> Now, before I say anything further, let me stress that I totally understand that whether he legilimenced James or not is not possible to prove and I am speculating. I base it on Dumbledore's character as I understand it in general that he would never IMO let something important to him go if he can get such knowledge and on him repeatedly legilimencing Harry without his consent. 
> 
> Alla
>
Nikkalmati

I agree that the Legilimans does not need consent, but can he or she do it without being detected?  I guess I would need chapter and verse on when Snape and DD are suspected of performing it undected on Harry (or anyone else) before I would take it as proof that such a thing is possible.  

Nikkalmati