[the_old_crowd] Re: something to read (i.e. His Dark Materials)
Ebony Elizabeth Thomas
selah_1977 at selah_1977.yahoo.invalid
Mon Jan 26 23:25:44 UTC 2004
Hey, everyone--
I'm about 90% out of HP fandom, but I did stay subbed to this list to stay in touch w/ old friends...
Let me fourth that Pullman recommendation. I'm currently semi-active on the Rutgers Child_Lit listserv, where Pullman and a whole host of children's and young adult lit authors not only belong, but weigh in on just about everything literary under the sun. From my experiences over the past six months, I find that Pullman's not only a talented author, but just about one of the most gracious people in the world. He's very responsive whenever people have questions about his work--for instance, I wanted to write (and now am writing) a teacher's guide to one of his understudied books and immediately entered into correspondence with him. A host of others are there, including lots of the more prominent Nimbus professor-types like Phil Nel and Eliza Dresang (who chaired this year's ALA awards).
It's a great virtual place to hang out--not really fannish at all, but just a wonderful community of professional writers, librarians, teachers, and kidlit professors chatting about their craft, their practice, and everything else under the sun. The message volume's moderately heavy (25-50+ on an average day), but you learn so much from even just lurking about the wider context from which Rowling's series evolved.
--Ebony
Neil Ward <neilward at ...> wrote:
Stephanie wrote:
<< HOW ODD -- I was just about to post myself and tell all of you
that I just finished Phillip Pullman's His Dark Materials series
(well, I haven't read the recent novella yet because Amazon is being
very slow in getting it here) -- the first book is called The Golden
Compass, originally published as The Northern Lights -- and I LOVED
these books. I know other Potter fans will love these books too so
go read them. I'd love to hear what you all think of them. >>
I adore this trilogy too, and to think that I only decided to read
them because I wanted something in the vein of Harry Potter whilst
waiting 'Book 5'. In the end, I'd worked my way through a whole
range of childlit/fantasy authors, including Philip Pullman, before
OoP came along.
I much prefer Philip Pullman over JKR as a writer and in the recent
Big Read vote in the UK - for those who haven't heard of it - His
Dark Materials (as a whole) was voted the nation's third most popular
book, behind LotR and Pride and Prejudice. Goblet of Fire came
fifth, with the first three HP books skirting the early 20s.
I tend to regard Harry Potter as a literary phenomenon hanging in the
balance, whereas HDM already has the stamp of literary classic. This
is perhaps partly because HDM is a complete series and not an ongoing
one, but I also feel that the HP series has become a little obese and
directionless. I hope I'll feel differently by the time I reach the
end of Book 7.
Last week, I saw the first part of the two-part stage adapation of
His Dark Materials at the National Theatre (NT) in London, and I'll
be seeing part II this Wednesday. Those of you who've read the books
will probably goggle at the idea of someone producing two plays from
three books of such imagination and scale, but the NT has managed it,
albeit with flaws, alterations and disappointments.
The other HP comparison that always struck me about His Dark
Materials was the fact that the first book was renamed for the
American market to something that wasn't strictly accurate. The
first book doesn't feature a golden compass, but it does feature
something that might be described as such. In the same way, as we're
all aware, the first Harry Potter book was renamed to refer to a
magical-sounding Sorcerer's Stone rather than the more accurate
Philosopher's Stone.
Neil
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the_old_crowd/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
the_old_crowd-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive