AKs and Horcrux!Harry and soul-ripping (was: Re: Stupid question about...)
eloise_herisson
eloiseherisson at eloise_herisson.yahoo.invalid
Tue Aug 23 07:57:11 UTC 2005
I enjoyed setting this one off and then watching wiser minds than mine
wrestle with the answer. Reading the responses, I'm still left with
questions and Debbie takes us right to the crux of the matter.
Debbie:
> In addition to Neri's point that Voldemort seems to have transferred
> some of his powers to Harry that night, the scar itself is odd. Avada
> Kedavra usually doesn't leave a mark, so why would a ricochet leave a
> scar?
1)Voldemort cast some spell at Harry that night. Belief in the WW is
that that spell was an AK and that Harry is the only person to have
survived it.
We Muggles have problems with this AK. *Why the heck* does anybody in
the WW think Harry was subject to one?
There *must* have been a witness (I think JKR's all but confirmed that
by refusing to anwer the question). Even that is problematic, for how
did the news disseminate? Did that witness tell the truth, did s/he lie
or was s/he mistaken?
What does Diary!Tom *know*? The fact that he knew about Harry's early
history is intriguing. It could have come from Ginny, OTOH, the diary
being a Horcrux, it should (perhaps?) also contain Voldemort's own
knowledge and experience up to the time it was made (as implied by
the "I am LV's past, present and future" speech). Diary!Tom seems to
believe that LV tried to *kill* Harry. In fact, Diary!Tom *still* wants
to kill Harry, so presumably doesn't think that the spell cast at him
was a Horcruxfacient, (or at the very least that it failed).
If Dumbledore knows it wasn't an AK, but an attempt at making a
Horcrux, then we're back to the question of why he's kept it quiet. I
know it's something Harry hasn't been capable of absorbing until very
recently, but given Dumbledore's recent urgency and probable awareness
of impending mortality, he left it a bit late.
2) Dumbledore tells us that using [any] living being as a Horcrux is
risky. Why would Voldemort want to make a Horcrux out of Harry,
believing he was the one powerful enough to vanquish him?
Was this simple vanity? A belief that by making him a Horcrux, he could
control him? Surely the easiest way was to finish the brat off and use
that particularly significant death to enable the creation of a new
Horcrux.
3)Dumbledore suggests (as above) that Voldemort uses significant deaths
to facilitate the making of Horcruxes and that he intended Harry's to
be the final death in the process.
If Dumbledore is wrong, and he intended Harry to be the Horcrux, whose
was the significant death he intended to use (James' would seem to pale
into insignificance next to Harry's)? Is this why Lily didn't need to
die? Because he had already killed James? Did he want Lily to live to
care for his living Horcrux?
So we have a spell that doesn't act like an AK and yet it not being one
just doesn't make sense from where I'm sitting.
I can only believe with Neri that if Harry *is* a Horcrux, then he is
an unintentional one and even then...
Well, all this soul-ripping stuff. Souls must get ripped all the time
without the ripped parts actually dissociating. Granted it's more
likely if you happen to get disembodied at the time.
But Voldemort's soul apparently got ripped *two* more times at GH, so
there were potentially three bits of soul floating around (counting the
one that is now in his body). And throughout his life it must have been
ripped many more than seven times. I do have problems envisaging how
then Voldemort gathers up the right quantity of soul to place in a
Horcrux (but then, like JKR, maths isn't my strong suit).
And just out of curiosity (and almost certainly irrelevantly) if you
were not quite as murderous as LV and just wanted to divide your soul
seven times, how would you control it so the rips came in the right
places? One would assume that when the soul rips, it divides fairly
evenly, so that as time went by you would be dividing smaller and
smaller fractions and that which remained in the body would be a very
small proportion of the original (no, I'm not going to attempt it and
show myself up).
Or perhaps it doesn't matter as you can't quantify a soul (though the
creation of Horcruces suggests you can).
Do/can the rips heal? Does *any* killing rip the soul? Are those who
kill in the course of war similarly damaged? And what damage exactly
does the ripping do?
~Eloise
More information about the the_old_crowd
archive