[the_old_crowd] Re: Anyone Going For The Leaked Book?

[ewe2]

On 7/20/07, Barry Arrowsmith <arrowsmithbt at ...> wrote:
> Nope.
> When news of this first started to circulate I did wonder if it was a bit
> of pre-publication fakery intended to wind up the readship. We've
> seen similar things in the past and the last volume would be an
> obvious target for jokers.
> Not so, it seems.
> Word has it that it's the true quill.
> Bugger.
> IMO it's not really important but it is intensely irritating. And the
> chances of inadvertently stumbling across massive spoilers has
> increased exponentially as the leak propagates across the web.
>

Wise course. The local news even had pictures of it, to my horror. I
suspect this is media's revenge. Word is that the perpertrator has
left enough inadvertent evidence to be traced from the serial number
in every picture.

-- 
Emacs vs. Vi flamewars are a pointless waste of time. Vi is the best