Conflicts, cheats and credibility

[mooseming]

--- In the_old_crowd at yahoogroups.com, "dungrollin" 
<spotthedungbeetle at ...> wrote:

 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
 Spoilers
Spoilers
> 
> > What I really need is a reread, with a notebook to hand. Not sure
> when that will happen, though. And, though I do care about what
> happened, I care so much more about whether it makes sense.
> >
> 
> Dung:
> Yes, absolutely. I really hope some hard-core fans are granted an 
> interview and give her a damn good grilling.
>

An accident happened to my brother Jim, when somebody threw a tomato 
at him, tomatoes are juicy and don't hurt the skin, but this one was 
specially packed in a tin.

Makes sense, sure it makes sense. She cheated. Plot lines not 
telegraphed ahead, magical objects breaking her own rules, people 
breaking her rules:

Wands don't make magic people do, er except in DH.
People don't come back from the dead, ditto.
Nothing blocks an AK, ditto.
Only way to cheat death is HRX, ditto.
The person holding the wand controls it, ditto.

Its a wonder anyone guessed anything at all really.

Jo