Back now/Misc queries (Re: Away for a couple of days)
annemehr
annemehr at yahoo.com
Fri Jun 25 02:40:48 UTC 2004
Carolyn:
> > Agree we should definitely have 'Shrieking Shack' category (and
later
> > MoM incident), but where should they go? There's an argument for
> > having major plot incidents somewhere under 'plot development' or
> > some such, but also possibly for having them located as sub-
> > categories within relevant book chapters. Thoughts please.
> >
Barry:
> A sub-set of plot developments would be fine, IMO.
> Why not have 'DD's gleam' there as well?
>
Anne:
I like having them under 'plot development' because it gathers them
all together, and some of them don't fit into discrete chapters. The
Shrieking Shack took several chapters, as did the Graveyard. Even the
MoM took more than one chapter: one getting to the prophecy orb, one
battling DEs in the DoM, and one in the Atrium, w/LV-DD battle.
'Occlumency lessons' might wind up here, I suppose, and what about
'Scar Connection' (which I wouldn't be sure is ancient magic -- or is it)?
Is that more thoughts than you wanted?
> > Carolyn:
> > I've been plaintively asking what to do with Peg Kerr-type stuff for
> > weeks. Answer came there none. Quite happy to have more
meta-themes if
> > you want them ...make a suggestion.
Barry:
> Meta-themes seems best IMO. Rashness could go in with
> Immaturity/Maturity, I think, and maybe fear with Bravery?
> Speaking of Peg - her latest didn't work very well - not easy to make
> 'Sloth in the WW' really gripping.
Anne:
Sorry, I've only coded up one Peg Kerr post, after reading how Carolyn
did one. I just ticked off a bunch of categories that seemed to fit,
and then marked it as a Fantastic Post (well, it was much better than
what else I'd been reading). Sloth, now, that'd be tough. Still, we
don't have to code them *all* as FPs do we? Or will it look odd to
have only 5 or 6 deadly sins? <g>
Barry:
> But it's difficult to put yourself in the mind of an end-user (or it is
> for me). Just what phrases/words will they favour when setting up a
> search? This is what I was getting at with Godric's Hollow. If they're
> looking for a thread to see who accompanied Voldy or if there was
> anybody else in the house, then GH would be their first choice. Can't
> be helped, I suppose; they'll just have to learn to use the index
> properly.
Anne:
We can't be all things to all people. I don't think it hurts to have
the end user do a *little* work -- for example, I can find my way
around the Lexicon much easier than the first time I used it. The end
user will be able to see a category list with all the 'd' entries to
help chose where to search, won't they?
The copyright question surprises me, although I have no expertise in
the subject. I just thought that if it was open to HPfGU members only,
accessible through the home page, we would be clear. But perhaps that
only would apply to the newer stuff, since the HBFile?
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive