Back now/Misc queries (Re: Away for a couple of days)

[a_reader2003]

--- In HPFGU-Catalogue at yahoogroups.com, "annemehr" <annemehr at y...> 
wrote:
> I like having them under 'plot development' because it gathers them
> all together, and some of them don't fit into discrete chapters. The
> Shrieking Shack took several chapters, as did the Graveyard. Even 
the MoM took more than one chapter: one getting to the prophecy orb, 
one battling DEs in the DoM, and one in the Atrium, w/LV-DD battle.
> 'Occlumency lessons' might wind up here, I suppose, and what about
> 'Scar Connection' (which I wouldn't be sure is ancient magic -- or 
is it)?
> 
> Is that more thoughts than you wanted?

Carolyn:
It looks like we are heading towards a 'major incidents' section. If 
so, probably should have more prominence than just tucked under 'plot 
development' (?)


> Barry:
 - not easy to make 'Sloth in the WW' really gripping.
> 
> Anne:
 Sloth, now, that'd be tough. Still, we don't have to code them *all* 
as FPs do we? Or will it look odd to have only 5 or 6 deadly sins? <g>

Carolyn:
Loved this one Anne! A nice problem indeed.. I certainly think the 
essays are uneven in quality. No, we shouldn't give FP status to 
anything that doesn't deserve it. Afer all, its unlikely any of the 
essays would actually get rejected, so they will get coded somewhere.



> Anne:
> The copyright question surprises me, although I have no expertise in
> the subject. I just thought that if it was open to HPfGU members 
only, accessible through the home page, we would be clear. But 
perhaps that only would apply to the newer stuff, since the HBFile?

Carolyn:
I am waiting for someone from Admin to reply to this in more detail. 
I am not quite clear what the problem is either. From the discussion 
on the Feedback list I understood that none of the incremental 
changes to the HB file over the years made any difference to the 
rules that people originally signed up to as members of the club, but 
I may be wrong.