Re: QUESTIONS ON CATEGORY 0 – REJECTS

[corinthum]

Since I've only been at this a week, I don't have much perspective 
yet.  But my two cents...

> CATEGORY 0 - REJECTS

> (0.8) Mere agreement/adding nothing new 
> This category is likely to be increasingly important as we move 
> forwards. Should it be split in two? What should our criteria be 
> for `adding nothing new'? I have been using it for both factual 
> queries like `Where did the twins get the Marauders' Map?/ (answer) 
> From Filch's cabinet', and repetitions of common theories like `I 
> think Voldemort and Harry are related' (unaccompanied by any 
detailed 
> analysis).

I've been using this one for any type of question (factual or asking 
opinions/theories).  The resulting replies to said questions are 
often relevant and coded as such, but the initial query I throw out 
unless the poster puts forth his or her own ideas.

-Kelly