[HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Hermione/Ron and the trio - NEW CODE, PLEASE NOTE
Ginger
quigonginger at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 22 12:59:32 UTC 2005
Carolyn:
What do other people think about having a 'Trio dynamics' category as
part of the characterisation section 1.4? This would be defined as
non-SHIP interactions?
Sean:
There are complex issues with each
character that only come to light in the context of the Trio, and
again I hope to hear from Ginger about her view from the SHIPing
side,
Ginger: I'm not ignoring you guys, really I'm not. I wanted to view some of my ship-trio posts so I'd have a clue what I was talking about. Makes for a nice change in my life.
Yes, trio dynamics, aside from shipping is a good idea. I think the trio has been analyzed in comparison to every trio known to man except Peter, Paul and Mary; Winkin, Blinkin and Nod; and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Ship and no-ship are pretty cut and dried, but if they just hint at shipping, I don't think it'll matter if they end up in both for now, although I think that if I were looking it up, I would expect a shipping post to be more than just a hint at it.
Before I start actually taking the weedwacker to posts, I just want to clarify one thing: I have been coding under the assumption that trio-shipping means that at least one of the trio is involved. So I have been putting Harry/Ginny and Herm/Krum in the trio category.
Is this correct? Or should I be hacking them out of there and leaving them in shipping in general.
Ginger, who is sick and is going to bed and will work on this later. Night night.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hpfgu-catalogue/attachments/20050222/c7ecf41d/attachment.html>
More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue
archive