[HPFGU-Catalogue] Re: Hermione/Ron and the trio - NEW CODE, PLEASE NOTE

Ginger quigonginger at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 22 12:59:32 UTC 2005



Carolyn:

What do other people think about having a 'Trio dynamics' category as 
part of the characterisation section 1.4? This would be defined as 
non-SHIP interactions? 

Sean:
There are complex issues with each 
character that only come to light in the context of the Trio, and 
again I hope to hear from Ginger about her view from the SHIPing 
side, 


Ginger: I'm not ignoring you guys, really I'm not.  I wanted to view some of my ship-trio posts so I'd have a clue what I was talking about.  Makes for a nice change in my life.

Yes, trio dynamics, aside from shipping is a good idea.  I think the trio has been analyzed in comparison to every trio known to man except Peter, Paul and Mary; Winkin, Blinkin and Nod; and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.  

Ship and no-ship are pretty cut and dried, but if they just hint at shipping, I don't think it'll matter if they end up in both for now, although I think that if I were looking it up, I would expect a shipping post to be more than just a hint at it.  

Before I start actually taking the weedwacker to posts, I just want to clarify one thing:  I have been coding under the assumption that trio-shipping means that at least one of the trio is involved.  So I have been putting Harry/Ginny and Herm/Krum in the trio category.  

Is this correct?  Or should I be hacking them out of there and leaving them in shipping in general.  

Ginger, who is sick and is going to bed and will work on this later.  Night night.


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://archive.hpfgu.org/pipermail/hpfgu-catalogue/attachments/20050222/c7ecf41d/attachment.html>


More information about the HPFGU-Catalogue archive