Shippity doo dah (could I ask a favour?)

[quigonginger]

Hi!  I have hacked the FITD and OBHWF to death.  

Could I ask that as we code in the future that we only code posts to 
these that specifically address the issue?  There were tons of posts 
in each that were trio relationships, but not FITD or OBHWF (and I 
admit that I was one of those who coded these).  Also, if it fits 
there, and talks only about FITD or OBHWF, could we not code it to 
trio ships unless it goes off on H/G or Herm/Krum, etc. as well?  
This would avoid a lot of duplication!  This applies to coding to the 
main relationship heading as well.  Thanks a ton from whomever edits 
the ship section in then end.  (That may well be me.)

That said, on to the report:

OBHWF:  was 53 posts, now 18 (one hilarious poster, David 
Frankinsworth, asked about the acromym and noted that he couldn't 
pronounce it without first eating a pillow- I laughed so hard I cried 
and added "Just for a laugh")

Rejected 3 posts that were all ship and 8 that effected others (5.6 
used)

Uncoded all ship on 8 posts, as it was redundant there (5.6)

FITD:  was 44 posts, now 14

Rejected 11 all-ship posts and 4 that effected others (5.6)

Uncoded ships to 1. (5.6)

On these 2 categories, I moved a lot to other ship categories.

Sex in the WW: was 43, now 37
Moved one to portrayals of men, women, gays.

Uncoded 5 from the category.

Rejected none.


On to trio ships.  It was a very good idea that we do this review 
now.  I think it will help with coding in the future.
Ginger, digging the dancing queen