Harry Potter gets Naked .... Really? -- Revised

zanooda2 zanooda2 at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 7 06:20:35 UTC 2009


--- In HPFGU-OTChatter at yahoogroups.com, "bboyminn" <bboyminn at ...> wrote:


> Also, note the claim that the Return of Ron and the Destroying
> of the Horcrux allegedly occur in Part 1. Does that or just
> after really seem like a good break point?


zanooda:

Earlier they said that the breaking point would be very soon after HRH's capture by the Snatchers, because they wanted the ending of the first movie to be something of a cliffhanger. I assumed that this meant the scene at Malfoy Manor or right after. However, Ron's return seems like a more convenient ending, so maybe they indeed changed their mind. I remember the director saying that the final decision will be made later, at the editing stage, and this kind of makes sense :-).  





More information about the HPFGU-OTChatter archive