Voldemort: Sexism/Honor etc.
Indigo
indigo at indigosky.net
Sat Jul 7 16:44:02 UTC 2001
No: HPFGUIDX 22072
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Susan Hall" <shall at s...> wrote:
Susan wisely shed much light upon the following:
>
> However, my point was that although Voldemort is indeed somewhat
sexist, he is neither sexist enough nor stupid enough to let Lily go
once he'd killed James and Harry because he would be putting himself
in grave danger having created an enemy with nothing to lose and the
most powerful motive for revenge going, something Machiavelli points
out is something no prince can adequately defend himself against.
This is absolutely true, and a situation I would not have considered
on my own, most likely. But yes, Lily would be all about vengeance
if Voldie killed James and Harry but let her live. *If* she had the
fortitude. Voldemort, being somewhat sexist if such is the case,
probably counted on it to destroy her utterly and sink her into a
bottomless pit of despair from which she could never hope to strike
at him.
Arrogance to the point of foolishness is often the hallmark of a
major villain, after all.
I don't think he would have taken the
risk. So I agree with you that he probably isn't a total sexist,
Possibly. It's hard to determine concretely one way or the other. I
mean, there's Narcissa Malfoy -- and we didn't see *her* Apparate in
with Lucius -- nor Mrs. Crabbe nor Mrs. Goyle.
So to my mind, at least, Mrs. Lestrange stands out among wizarding
women on Voldie's side. I think that being devoted to her man and
his cause might be laudable to a sexist, but I think Mrs. Lestrange
herself is in it for her own reasons. Being the only woman in an
entire all boys club of evil wizards is not an easy situation, I'm
sure -- so she must be willing to get something back for the
sacrifice.
but
> disagree about whether he would have let Lily live.
So you believe he lied when he said "You don't have to die."
I certainly can't find
> any canonical evidence for a "skewed sense of honour" towards
wizards.
Goblet of Fire.
Instead of taking Harry out on the spot, Voldemort made sure Harry
had his wand, and they *duelled*.
That's what I mean by skewed sense of honour. That might've been
arrogant pride talking but it also came across as giving a worthy
adversary a fighting chance.
Indigo
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive