No more alphabet, please (was: Ginny's name and the Sorting hat)
blpurdom
blpurdom at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 11 21:00:08 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 37730
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., m.bockermann at t... wrote:
> However, since the whole survival of the alphabet naming
> theory depends on Percy and Ron being known by their middle names,
> why can't the same argument be made for Ginny?
Umm, because they didn't name the kids based on the alphabet, that's
why. Good grief--why has this theory persisted? The first child's
name is William. Then Charles. Then Percival. Then Fred could be
either Frederick, Alfred, Wilfred or any number of other names
containing Fred. George is obviously just George. Then Ronald.
Then Virginia. WCP?GRV doesn't look like the alphabet to me. JKR
is pretty clever about names, IMO. I believe the meanings are the
important thing and to try to discern some hidden message by
proposing convoluted theories based on initials is really reaching.
Particularly when--I'll say it again--the first child's name begins
with "W." If JKR were going with the alphabet, Charlie should have
been named "Xylophone," Percy should have been "Yeti" and the twins
should have been "Zig" and "Zag" and Molly and Arthur would have
stopped there.;)
--Barb
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive