[HPforGrownups] Transfiguration, pets, LOLLIPOPS, animal communication, acronyms
Jenserai Bariman
jenserai at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 15 17:35:06 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 37834
>Tabouli wrote:
>However, mysteriously enough, Sirius makes no mention of Snape cursing them
>in high school. Instead, he describes Snape as acting entirely within the
>rules and snooping around trying to get them expelled. Perhaps Snape's
>scared of getting caught and punished, but I somehow suspect Snape would be
>pretty good at being cunning and underhand and evading punishment. I think
>it's more likely there was something else in the equation. Someone else.
>Someone who believed in principles and treating people fairly and kindly.
>
Not necissarily. I'm of the opinion that most teachers are at least a little
biased against Slytherin students (even Dumbledore). I think Severus would
not have had a chance to be cunning and avoid punishement. They would have
seen a Slytherin attacking Gryffindors and disciplined him, no questions
asked.
>Tabouli continued:
Sirius describes Snape as "slimy", a comment which (presumably!) must be
referring to his behaviour rather than his physical appearance. Slimy means
dishonestly flattering. Why would Sirius, whom Snape loathed at school,
witness him flattering anyone? Unless, of course, Sirius is referring to
Snape's attempts to woo Lily.
I have to disagree here as well. "Slimy" could have easily been in reference
to his hair, or if it *was* his attitude, Sirius would hhave had plenty of
chances to notice besides flirting with Lily. What if there was a teacher
that behaved a bit like Snape back then, favoring the Slytherins? Snape
could have been a teachers pet, which Sirius would have resented, especially
if it were a subject he didn't excell in.
-Jens
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive