[HPforGrownups] Re: Slightly OT: Thoughts on Apparation/Gringrotts Security
Yoris
msn.tsf at hccnet.nl
Tue Aug 13 09:23:58 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 42555
Just a small note on selective charms
bboy said:
> True there could be selective anti-appparation charms but I don't
> think we've seen any examples of charms that are that selelctive. But
> then we are dealing with magic, so anything is possible.
What about the enchantment dumbledore set onto the GoF, that only let people
through above a certain age. What about the magic book of eleven year olds,
it even selects on two thingies: the kids must have become eleven AND the
kids must be wizzards.
Gingrotts Security
On the end of PoA Sirius writes in a letter to harry, he tells him "i used
your name but told them to take the gold from Gringotts vault number seven
hundred and eleven - my own."
How could Sirius use Harry's name to acces his own vault? because for the
people in the bank it would seem like Harry asking money from SOMEONE ELSES
account, and why would they grant such a request?
Sure there is thing about the keys but what if a key would got stolen? i
hope those keys aren't the only protection, you saw how easily sirius could
break in into an house and what if he would have token the key of the people
living there on his way?
Also he didn't really go to gringrotts he only send an owl, and would he
send his key - being the ONLY claim on all his money- with it? I think not,
if he would have lost that key he would lose ALL of his money, and he didnt
have a reliabel owl too.
Well it seems to me that Gringrotts security is REALLY sucky and then i'm
asking myself how come noone ever abused it
Yoris
-- wishes to be a wizzard-fraud
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive