Fudge is evi l was TBAY: The Order of the Flying Hedgehog: open for business
Ali <Ali@zymurgy.org>
Ali at zymurgy.org
Mon Dec 16 20:32:28 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 48390
Fudge is evil?
Why does Fudge need to be "good" or "evil"? Why can't he be as his
name implies a fudge between the two?
I don't think that it would be unfair to see the characters in the
Potterverse as on a good/bad continuum. Voldemort is fairly obviously
at the end of the bad, and for argument sake I put Dumbledore at the
end of the good. No other character is painted in such black and
white terms. Even Harry, who we know will never go to the bad side is
hardly an angel. He lies, he enjoys getting one over Draco, yet, he
is virtuous and brave and acts selflessly for the benefit of the
good.
Why must Fudge then be "evil"? By failing to believe that a risen
Voldemort was possible, and failing to act, or worse still,
preventing Dumbledore from acting to stop Voldemort in his tracks, he
is benefiting the Dark side. This stance doesn't need to be because
he wants Voldemort to come back. Rather that he is so scared of the
memories of Voldemort's previous reign, that he is incapable of
rising to the challenge. This makes him dangerous. Certainly history
will not regard him kindly, but it does not make him evil. He can be
self absorbed, terrified of losing his position. This wouldn't
qualify him as a "goodie", but it hardly makes him evil.
Fudge is certainly very dangerous. Allowing Sirius to lie unconvicted
in the cells of Azkaban is hardly a trait that I would admire in a
politician. There are definite questions to be asked over Sirius'
arrest and indeed Hagrid's. These could easily be explained by the
word "fear". Is it not possible that Sirius' wand still lies bagged
up in an evidence archive. There was no trial, there is no
suggestion even that Sirius gave a witness statement or tried to
tell anyone what happened. The circumstantial evidence was
compelling; people looked no further.
Fear would perhaps have allowed for Sirius' arrest in what was
effectively wartime. Internment has been justified in such times of
crisis by many countries that would otherwise like to display a sound
judicial system. Whilst this makes me personally feel very
uncomfortable it does not make him worse than many leaders over the
years.
Fudge's failure to move on though, is shown by the absence of a trial
even years later for Sirius. He is driven by fear of bad public
opinion. This fear drives him to send Hagrid to Azkaban and failure
to check Lucius' influence upon committees within the wizarding world.
As others and I have previously commented, I am struck by the
resemblance of Fudge to Neville Chamberlain. Chamberlain had seen
Britain go through the First World War, carnage so horrific that he
was prepared to do, or believe anything to stop it happening again.
Of course, appeasement proved a catastrophic disaster and led Hitler
to grow unchecked. This policy was evidently very wrong but the
belief behind it was not evil.
I also speculate on Fudge as a kind of Pontius Pilate figure. When
Harry was the darling of the populus, Fudge was very protective of
him. If the tide changes, I would not be surprised to see Fudge
martyr Harry, figuratively, at the very least.
Ali
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive