SHIP R/H, H/H
jchutney
jchutney at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 25 19:04:02 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 34066
--- In HPforGrownups at y..., "Hillman, Lee" <lee_hillman at u...> wrote:
> I think you've hit on something important here. Yes, I agree with
Penny that you made some broad generalizations about shippers'
motivations, and that that's a no-no, but I do think there is some
validity in your canon-based points.>
LOL! So, are you saying that it's wrong to make generalizations,
but in this case, they're right? :) Honestly, I didn't mean to
offend. I think I betray my own prejudices as an English major. There
are so many ways to "read" text, etc. Obviously, the more
complicated the material, the more ways to read the text hence, the
20,000 ways to view Hamlet. Honestly, I don't have
an "investment" in H/R. JKR can kill them both off in BkV (poor
Harry!), and I'll keep reading cause she's a damn fine writer. I
cannot prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that JKR is setting up H/R or
that H likes R. However, IMO, we can all see that by a preponderance
of evidence, that this more likely than not. (If I were to approach
it mathematically I'd say that even though it's not 100%, it's
maybe 60% likely to be true.) So, when discussing the topic with
H/Hers, I speculate as to the motivations, etc that lead someone to
an alternate view. I have taken alternate views myself re: Art. I
always thought Kate Hepburn should have chosen Jimmy Stewart in the
Philadelphia Story! I know I'm in the minority and non-canon. I
also know that JS's "decency" was far more endearing to ME that
Cary Grant's "suavity". There is nothing wrong with a preference
or a prejudice as long as we're aware of it. Is it truly wrong to
look at the values, biases, etc., we bring to the table when
analyzing art?
>Human beings, rightly or wrongly, frequently are attracted to the
kind of person who is exactly the worst match. In message 29544, I
said: "I think her interaction with Ron, particularly her frustration
when he doesn't perform up to her par on either academic issues or
questions of their mystery-solving, is indicative of a desire to see
Ron be something he isn't
And personally, I believe it would be a
disaster if they did get together. Hermione is doing something that,
unfortunately, many intelligent, otherwise sensible young (and not so
young) women do: banking on potential, not reality." >
Now I regret my unkind comments about Ron! LOL! Ron's flawed but he
does have loads of good qualities. I would quibble slightly with
your assessment of Hermione. If she's banking on potential, why do
that when she could after "the real thing" in Harry? Maybe it's
the "flaws" sarcasm, devil-may-care attitude, willingness to
bicker, open emotion, etc. that appeal to Hermione? I actually
wonder if Hermione would like Ron as much if he "grew up" and
became academic like Percy or "cool" like Bill.
jchutney
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive