Dishwashers , Puppy hunts and werewolf excursions
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Sat Jun 15 19:00:50 UTC 2002
No: HPFGUIDX 39896
I wrote:
>>> The situation changes when Sirius turns up missing and
evidence is found that he planned to declare himself openly for
Voldemort when the Potters died. Then Dumbledore wants
Sirius found. The Ministry has far better resources for a
puppy-hunt than Dumbledore has, once they bestir themselves.
It doesn't make sense for Dumbledore to hold back any
information that will help locate Black. Better to find him first,
and *if* he turns out to be innocent of betraying the Potters, and
*if* the Ministry is able to substantiate that Black is an
animagus, then Dumbledore can worry about helping Black
beat the unregistered animagus rap. <<<
Pip:
>Several questions with this - firstly, what evidence? What Fudge
says is ''Black was tired of his double-agent role, he was ready
to declare his support openly for you-know-who, and he seems
to have planned this for the moment of the Potters' death.'' (PoA,
p. 153, UK hardback)
This could be taken to mean a) Fudge is indulging in
after-the-event speculation
b) Peter planted evidence that was found *after* the street fight.
That the Ministry had evidence *before* the street fight is only
one possiblity out of several - c), in fact.<<<
So, according to a) and b) there never was a puppy-hunt. Fudge
is giving the misleading impression that the Ministry was
pursuing Black prior to his attack on the Muggles, when in fact
they didn't have a clue. They not only didn't catch up with him first,
they weren't chasing him at all. If it hadn't been for Pettigrew's
supposed heroism, Black would have got away clean. Very
ingenious, and in character for Fudge, except that the person in
charge of the Department of Magical Law Enforcement at the
time was the now discredited Barty Crouch, Sr. Why would
Fudge be trying to make him look good now, twelve years after
the fact? Or is Fudge covering for Dumbledore? Because this
really makes Dumbledore look useless--he spends twelve
hours or whatever totally involved (no multi-tasking for him!) in
arranging some extra protection for the one person who already
has more protection than anyone else, while a murderer is on
the loose and a threat to innocent people, twelve of whom
eventually die.
Pip:
>>I stand by the ambiguity of the canon. Dumbledore says 'an
extraordinary achievement - not least keeping it quiet from
me'(PoA p. 312) when he could have said 'an extraordinary
acheivement - not least that it's one of the few things I've never
found out' or something else equally unambiguous. (See post
39841)<<
If Dumbledore only uses ambiguity when the truth is the
opposite of his surface meaning, that's not actually very clever. I
really must invite him over for a round of poker some time <g>.
I don't think Dumbledore would be above allowing a little whisper
of doubt to exist in young Harry's mind about whether James et
al had actually gotten clean away with it, if only to cover his
chagrin that they had done so indeed. <g>
Miss Marple would understand.
BTW, if Dumbledore didn't know about the Secret Keeper switch,
what made him so sure that Pettigrew was really a Death Eater?
Pettigrew could have been in hiding because he put the Death
Eaters' best man in Azkaban, just as he claimed. Would
Dumbledore allow a known Death Eater to murder a man whose
only crime was choosing to live as a harmless rat?
What troubles me about the whole MAGIC DISHWASHER
scenario is that it's all predicated on the idea that Voldemort can't
be killed while he's a disembodied spirit. Dumbledore has to
force him to re-embody so that he can be destroyed, lest
Dumbledore perish of old age before Harry is ready to carry on
the fight.
There must have been some way to destroy the disembodied
Voldemort, or he would have had no reason to stay hidden.
Perhaps it was a means, such as Dementors, that Dumbledore
would never use. But the mere threat of it was enough to keep
Voldemort in hiding. In the twelve years before Pettigrew returned
to him, Voldemort managed to kill exactly one person. That
situation doesn't change if Dumbledore dies. It changes if
Voldemort comes back.
Voldemort has to come back before he can resume his career
as a ruthless killer. If he refrains from killing, Dumbledore has
no interest in him. He doesn't care who rules the wizarding world
and he doesn't care about immortality. As long as they're not
aiding Voldemort, Flamel and Fudge and even Lucius Malfoy can
do as they please with Dumbledore's blessing. Dumbledore
isn't trying to prevent Voldemort from coming back as an
immortal. He's trying to keep Voldemort from coming back at all.
Applying Grey Wolf's strategy lesson, Voldemort would have tried
his best scheme for coming back first. The first and best option
was for a faithful servant to return to him...for this Voldemort was
willing to endure ten horribly painful years of staving off death by
sheer effort of will. He might have been lying about that, but why?
Surely not to gain sympathy <g>.
Each successive scheme for coming back, including
persuading someone to steal the Stone for him, using a
possessed body to steal the Stone, etc. must have been less
desireable than the one preceding it. Why would Dumbledore
choose the best option to facilitate when Voldemort himself had
given up on it?
Voldemort is in successively worse positions after PS and CoS.
Dumbledore was *winning*...why take the chance that Pettigrew
will flee to Voldemort before Harry has a chance to spare his
life?
It nearly happened. Probably the only reason Pettigrew remained
hiding in Hagrid's hut after faking his death again was that he
couldn't get past the Dementors or didn't dare to try. Being an
animagus was no protection from them, since they can drain the
magic from a wizard if there are enough of them. It only works for
Sirius because he knows, with doggish purity of heart, that he is
innocent. Pettigrew knows no such thing. But all Pettigrew has to
do is wait until Harry goes home again and the Dementor
guards will leave. He came within a week of succeeding. He
was discovered only by accident, when Hermione broke the jug.
Finally, this last argument against Dumbledore the extremely
grey. Dumbledore's relationships are built on trust. Those who
have known him best and longest trust him most: Snape,
McGonagall, and most tellingly Fawkes, whom only loyalty can
tame. LeCarre spymasters may be revered, but they are not
trusted except by the most gullible of their tools, and those never
last long in the Spying Game.
Pippin, wondering whether the grave yard post will refute all this.
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive