Time-Travel- why Harry *can* save himself (was: POA Dementor Kiss on Harry)
severusbook4
severusbook4 at yahoo.com
Wed Aug 27 18:40:35 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 78976
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <bboy_mn at y...> wrote:
> --- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "Talisman"
<talisman22457 at y...>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Laurasia:
> > > Your premise that we are always stuck with a soul-sucked Harry
> > unless someone else saves him relies on one thing- that there
has
> > to be a `first time' that time occurs in which no-one has gone
back
> > in time.
> >
> > Talisman:
> > Indeed, every one of your theories acknowledges the same
> > premise. But, let's distinguish time as a dimension versus time
as
> > an instance or occurance.
> >
> > Laurasia:
> > That is- because you believe that Time happens multiple times
> > > . . .<snip> This is a great theory- except that Time doesn't
have
> > to function multiple times. Instead of thinking about Time
> > occurring many times over, think about time only ever happening
> > once.
> > >
> > Talisman:
> > You apparently didn't comprehend the post. If you will re-read
> > #78370, you will find that I devote a good deal of time
explaining
> > how Harry can't save himself in a "one seamless time/multiple
> > experiences" scenerio.
> >
> > ...edited...
> >
> > Talisman,
>
>
> bboy_mn:
> Well, you say that you debunked the "one seamless time/multiple
> experiences" scenerio in post #78370, but I don't see it. You
cetainly
> mention it, you certainly reached conclusions, but I don't see that
> you established those conclusions.
>
> Here are a couple of interesting posts that might help you gain a
> different perspective in time travel. I will add that these are my
posts.
>
> Quick Look at Time Travel
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/57776
>
> Hermione Aging via Time turner
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HPforGrownups/message/53555
>
> You point out that we must be careful about how we regard time;
> whether it is an event or a dimension.
>
> I agree, and will add that time is RELATIVE (Thank you Dr.
Einstein).
> We have one immutable source of time which is neutral and
independant,
> marching ever forward; I call that the timeline. Then we have
people's
> perception of that passage of time, and we have time as a
biological
> event; the wearing down of the human body.
>
> In the timeline, three Hermiones existed at once; relative to the
> timeline, Hermione lives one hour as three parallel occurances. But
> from Hermione's perspective and from the perspective of the
biological
> passing of time (wear and tear), Hermione sees three consecutive
> hours. Remember time is relative, what you see depends on the
> perspective you view it from.
>
> This is what the timeline sees-
> 9:00AM - three Hermiones appear at the doorway to three separate
> classrooms (say Arithmacy, Ancient Runes, and Tranfiguration), and
> then she takes those classes in parallel thereby allowing her to
be in
> all three classes at once which in neutral unbiased time is one
hour.
>
> What Hermione sees-
> 9:00AM to 10:00AM - Hermione goes to Transfigurations, at 10AM she
> time travels back to 9AM.
>
> 9:00AM to 10:00AM - Hermione goes to Ancient Runes, at 10AM she
time
> travels back to 9AM.
>
> 9:00AM to 10:00PM - Hermione goes to Arithmacy, at 10AM she goes to
> her first 10AM class.
>
>
> Three Hermione's appear at 9:00am and take all three classes. From
> Hermione's perspective, she takes three consecutive classes, and
lives
> three consecutive hours. We only seen the passing of one hour, if
we
> take the perspective of the immutable, neutral, and independant
timeline.
>
> On the night of the Dementors in PoA, the neutral unbiased timeline
> proceeds forward 24 hours in that one day. From the perspective of
> Harry and Hermione, and their biological mechanisms, the day is
> actually 27 hours long. Within the confines of that 24 hour
timeline,
> Harry and Hermione experience 27 hours of linear time.
>
> Expanding this to Hermione's studies and time travel through out
the
> school years, the rest of the students have experienced 10 months
of
> time both in the timeline and in their perspective. Hermione
because
> of her time travels has experienced 10 months and 33 days. That's
why
> Hermione is always so tired, because in biological self-perceived
> time, Hermione is living 30 hour days.
>
> Getting back to the PoA night of the Dementors, at approximately
> 9:00PM, the original Harry and Hermione along with Ron are hiding
in
> the entrance hall, and just miss the time traveling Harry and
Hermione
> as they appear in the entrance hall and hide in the cupboard. JKR
> makes a point of showing us this scene from the perspective of both
> parties, and imples that each hears the other's footsteps. This is
JKR
> hint pointing us to the fact that the first, and one and only time
> through these events, both sets of Harry and Hermione were there.
>
> In the linear, unbiased, neutral timeline at the one and only time
> 9:00PM occurred, both Harry and Hermione, and time travel Harry and
> Hermione are there. Since TT!Harry is there, having arrived at
9pm, he
> is there and available at approx 11:30pm to save himself from the
> Dementors.
>
> So in summary, Time is Relative; in the neutral time line, TT!Harry
> and TT!Hermione were always there because they arrived at 9pm, and
9pm
> only occurs once. From the perceived passing of time and in
biological
> time, Harry and Hermione experience 9pm twice, but that is a
> perception that is relative to their point of view.
>
> Harry was always there because he arrived at 9pm in the linear
> unbiased timeline; saving himself occurred after 9pm.
>
> Just a thought.
>
> bboy_mn
Severus here:
Excellent post, you explained it very well. I could not figure out
how to put into terms so it would sound understandable, instead of
sounding like someone who is mentally divergent (12 monkeys w/ Bruce
W.). I was trying to compare it to traveling through a town,
section, something without using the loop description. I really
felt for Hermione during those times, and I thought I was tired
after a 70 hour work week, just think of adding 6+ hours to each of
your days. Once again, Great post.
Sevvy
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive