PoA: an explanation of the time/patronus paradox
sevenhundredandthirteen
sevenhundredandthirteen at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 7 02:25:41 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 67941
Nemi wrote:
> If time works like that in JKR's universe there could be a second
gunman as
> it were. Buckbeak was *always* saved, the patronus was *always*
cast. It had
> to be, just like the ball going into the goal. But so long as the
events
> happened it didn't matter who did it.
<Am I making any sence at all here?
Me:
This is the whole idea of a self-consistent time-travel. It all
starts with the 'grandfather-paradox.' The idea is, what would happen
if you went back in time and killed your grandfather before your
parent was created, therefore you couldn't be born. But if you
weren't born then you could never live to the age where you went back
in time to kill your grandfather in the first place, therefore, your
grandfather would have never been killed. Etc, etc, etc. It's a never-
ending loop which doesn't have an answer. So this is why scientists
came up with the parallel dimension theory- so that everytime you
travel through time you are put into another world where whatever you
do in this dimension has no affects whatsoever on any other parallel
dimension. Esentially- you could kill your grandfather in this
dimension because it was your grandfather in the *other* dimension
who caused you to be born.
The other theory is that time is self-consistent- that no matter how
hard you tried to kill your grandfather, your would keep failing and
failing again, (because, you are alive- therefore he needs to live).
We can see that in JKR's world- Harry and Hermione etc needed to be
saved by the Patronus, or else they would never live to go back and
cast it. On the theory of parallel dimensions- if there was
no 'person x' (whoever they may be), to save Harry the he would've
died, so he could never go back to save himself (but you see, he
wouldn't *need* to go back in time to save himself, as, hewas not
saved). With the addition of 'person x' Harry was saved by 'x' so
that Harry may go back into another dimension where 'person x' was
doing something else, and hence, Harry saves himself.
If Harry is saved he *must be saved everytime* If he had died, he
*must die everytime.* So, yes, Nemi, you *are* making sense (at least
to me).
This is why I agree with the idea of one singular plane of time-
because with only one plane of time Harry is only saved *once.*
Buckbeak is saved only *once.* So that there is no need for the 'ball
to go through the goal however it can, but it still goes through
regardless,' because it only went through once.
~<(Laurasia)>~
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive