OoP: What was the Point of this Death?
psychic_serpent
psychic_serpent at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 24 23:54:31 UTC 2003
No: HPFGUIDX 63282
> Megalynn:
> >
> > Ok I have to comment on Sirius' death, and not just a me too on
> > the fact that it was a pointless death. It was so quick, it did
> > nothing for the plot, there wasn't a buildup, there wasn't a
> > goodbye. Harry has still never been told by anyone that they
> > love him. This bugs me, and to kill off such an important
> > character and not even well... it's like in Shakespeare, where
> > if the person dies off-stage that meant Shakespeare did not see
> > them as important. I am not saying JKR finds Sirius unimportant
> > at all, I just feel somewhat cheated that he died off-stage so
> > to speak.
Grey Wolf:
> The point of Sirius's death is that it *is* pointless.
[snip]
> Honour before life. He was ready to give his life to save Harry,
and that's exactly what he did. And of course, there is a very
important lesson here - the good guys don't always win. The white
hat doesn't shoot the straightest or draws the quickest.
> Megalynn:
> > Also, I had said many times that the one character that would
> > utterly make me livid if they died was Sirius. He already lost
> > his life once, and suffered dearly for no reason. He more than
> > anyone deserved happiness once the war is over. I always
> > pictured him getting married and having kids and making harry
> > their Godfather after all this.
I'm afraid I have to disagree somewhat with the above. (Folks
who've seen me post something similar on other lists, forgive me.
<g>) It wasn't pointless at all, but I think the reasons go
far deeper than simply giving Harry the opportunity to mourn someone
close to him. That could have been accomplished by killing off any
of the characters who are in his inner circle. The thing to ask
ourselves is why Sirius in particular?
Sirius and Voldemort are doppelgangers.
Each of them sets out to prevent something happening--Voldemort's
fall, Harry's being endangered by Wormtail--only to have the thing
being avoided occur precisely BECAUSE they set out to stop it.
For two years, Harry wasn't in the least bit of danger from Peter.
Peter seemed quite content, in fact, to live as Ron's pet (apart
from needing to be protected from Crookshanks constantly from the
beginning of third year) and even stood up for the trio the time he
bit Goyle's finger. I think he had come to think of Ron, Hermione
and Harry, plus the Weasleys as a whole, as his family, and had he
not been exposed as the true traitor, he would never have returned
to Voldemort and assisted him in his returning to his body. Sirius
set all this in motion when he saw Peter in the newspaper he
borrowed from Fudge.
Voldemort, of course, learned about a prophecy concerning Harry, and
even though he didn't know the whole thing, went off half-cocked to
Godric's Hollow, after he got the info from Peter, and tried to kill
Harry, which was the very thing that brought about what he was
trying to avoid (mostly, since he was, to borrow words from the
Princess Bride, only "mostly dead").
His coming back may sometimes seem pointless, given the way he died
here, but I think the purpose of his coming back is what I've stated
above, to set certain events in motion and to be a counterpoint to
someone else--Voldemort--who did something similar; it also gives
someone who's on the 'good' side a rather black mark against him and
gives us some much-needed grey areas. There are now two things he's
done that have helped Voldemort. His plan to make Peter Secret
Keeper was the first, and then his plan to avenge himself on Peter
was the second. Perhaps that's why we don't see him get his revenge
or get cleared; in a way, he carries a certain amount of guilt for
many things that transpired (he even tells Harry that he feels
guilty about all this in the Shrieking Shack in third year) and
therefore the events he's set in motion may need to play out to
their logical conclusion (Harry and Voldemort having their ultimate
confrontation) before it can come out that he didn't betray the
Potters.
On further consideration, I'm resigned to their being no memorial to
Sirius in this book. Yeah, it would have been nice, but it's
probably too soon. And while the statement that Sirius had become
like a cross between a father and a brother to Harry seems somewhat
spurious, given that they didn't really get all that close, I think
the reason why the father/brother comparison was being drawn was to
highlight the ways in which Harry and Sirius are also doppelgangers.
"Father" could be thought of as a metaphor here, in that he set in
motion so many of the events that "created" the mystique that is
Harry Potter. "Brother" could be regarded metaphorically as well,
in that they each endured a long incarceration (Sirius in Azkaban,
Harry under the stairs at the Dursleys) with creatures who were
adept at making others miserable (dementors/Dursleys). Another
similarity between the two of them is that when Harry had the chance
to kill Sirius, and later Peter (after learning that he'd been the
Secret Keeper) he couldn't do it, whereas Sirius was quite willing
to kill Peter and that was his main goal when he broke out of
Azkaban. Harry's choices continue to make him who he is, and he
chooses not to be a murderer, whereas Sirius does--hence the lack of
redemption. He has no remorse for wanting to kill Peter, and
therefore cannot be redeemed. I doubt that even had he lived he
would ever have developed remorse for feeling this way about Peter.
I think the real lesson for Harry to learn from all this is not how
to grieve, but how not to be like Sirius, who never got over his
need for revenge--which was why he ended up in prison--and so that
gave him a cursed life ("a half-life," as the people are described
who would dare drink unicorn's blood). Harry came dangerously close
to being very, very much like Sirius every time he blew up at
Umbridge and made situation worse. I also think that Harry needs to
make sure he doesn't do what both Sirius and Voldemort did--set out
to prevent something and by doing so bring those events about. He
needs to face his future square in the face and deal with it head
on. So while it may be dissatisfactory in some ways for a character
to be a life-lesson for Harry, it's a contrast that's good for her
to have in the books. I don't think it's for nothing at all, once
you consider some of the deeper meanings.
--Barb
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Psychic_Serpent
http://www.schnoogle.com/authorLinks/Barb
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive