Time, Repetition and the Uber-Dimension

sevenhundredandthirteen sevenhundredandthirteen at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 8 21:24:32 UTC 2003


No: HPFGUIDX 80215

Talisman wrote:
> Obviously, my theory DOES include the lengthy time-travel 
discussion 
> that followed.

Indeed it does, but your theory actually works with *every* version 
of time-travel so far theorised. It works with the 'it-happened-once' 
it works with the multi-dimensional, it works with the memory-modify 
version, it works with your own version of time-travel. Rather than 
exclude other versions of time-travel by saying that your own is 
superior, this theory can work with *any* version.

The theories usually go as follows:

1. Time happens only once. You can't change Time.
(Harry was always there. He did save himself)

[But if we include your Snape theory it would go 'Harry was always 
there, but *never* saved himself- He just *thought* that he did]


2. Time happens only once. You can change Time, except we haven't 
seen it happen yet.
(Harry was always there. He did save himself)

[But if we include your Snape theory it would go 'Harry was always 
there, but *never* saved himself- He just *thought* that he did]


3. Time happens only once. You can change Time and we have seen it 
happen.
(Harry was always there but he didn't always save himself. Someone 
else did, then he changed this.)


4. Time happens more than once. You can change Time and we've seen it 
happen.
(Harry wasn't always there. Someone else saved him, then he changed 
this.)
	Time works in parallel dimensions.

You see? What I was trying to say wasn't 'this has *nothing* to do 
with time-travel' What I was trying to say was 'this works with *any* 
and *every* version of time-travel.' Anyone can support this theory 
without having to change their view on time-travel.

~<(Laurasia)>~






More information about the HPforGrownups archive