Snape and the MOM
cubfanbudwoman
susiequsie23 at sbcglobal.net
Sun Mar 14 19:27:46 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 92986
Carol:
> I also don't think that Snape has to report everything that
> happens at Hogwarts, so there's no reason for him to say anything
> about Umbridge. He also would have no way of *instantly* notifying
> LV that Harry was missing
Susan:
How do we know that, Carol? Didn't DD tell Harry at the end of OoP
that Order members have "more reliable means of communication" than
fireplaces? He didn't explain what those means are but left it open
for a futute revelation. (Fawkes, for one, seems to have some
pretty powerful magical abilities; I wonder if he can't provide
almost instantaneous communication?) Anyway, if DD & the Order have
such means, why might not Voldy & his henchmen/women?
Carol:
> Anyway, I don't think he reported to Voldemort that night; he
> was too busy contacting other people and searching the forest for
> Harry.
Susan:
Totally ignoring the argument at hand (whether Snape did or didn't
contact Voldy that night), I would argue only that if more efficient
means of communication exist, as DD said, why would time constraints
prevent Snape (or any other adult player that night) from sending
out important communication? How much time does it take to jot a
note or send a messenger?
(For what it's worth, on the argument at hand, I don't think Snape
did contact Voldy that night, but I do think he might have been able
to had that been his choice.)
Siriusly Snapey Susan
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive