Snape and the Order
elfundeb2
elfundeb at comcast.net
Wed Mar 24 18:50:18 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 93852
Carol:
So
> I think that Snape was working in the utmost secrecy, with only DD
> aware of what he was doing until he was hauled in front of Crouch
as a
> suspected DE and cleared by Dumbledore's testimony. That was the
> point, I'm guessing, when DD decided to give Snape a teaching
position
> to keep him safe.
I think Dumbledore's testimony came in a closed, grand jury-type
hearing, not before the Wizengamot (or Wizard's Council, as it is
called in GoF), since nobody knows Snape was a DE, while everyone,
even Ron, seems to know how Lucius Malfoy escaped justice. If so,
Dumbledore's testimony would not have put Snape in additional
danger.
>
> Unlike Potioncat, I think he became a teacher before Voldemort's
fall
> (around September 1 rather than November 1 or so).
I think canon strongly implies that Snape did not begin teaching at
Hogwarts until *after* the events at Godric's Hollow. (In my wilder
moments, I believe Snape was *at* Godric's Hollow and sounded the
alarm, though I have no canon support for this.) In the Shrieking
Shack, Sirius was very surprised to discover that Snape was at
Hogwarts, and only at that point did he learn that Snape was a
teacher. However, I think that Snape took up residence at Hogwarts
as a sanctuary immediately afterwards.
Just to clarify: do you think Dumbledore testified before Crouch
*before* Voldemort's fall? Otherwise it would be inconsistent to say
that Dumbledore gave Snape the job before Godric's Hollow if he
didn't decide to do it until after hist testimony.
That's the only way
> I can explain the DEs in Azkaban knowing about Pettigrew when Snape
> apparently didn't. If he was at Hogwarts that Halloween night (and
the
> week or so before while the Secret Keeper arrangements were being
> made), he wouldn't know that Peter, not Sirius, betrayed the
Potters.
> He'd be as much in the dark as Dumbledore apparently was.
I doubt very many people knew that Pettigrew was working for the
DEs. It would have endangered Pettigrew's role to spy on the Order
if more people knew than were absolutely necessary. After
Voldemort's disappearance, however, any intelligence the DEs had that
Pettigrew had ratted on his friends in order to be on the winning
side would be very important to know because it would establish his
lack of trustworthiness in future operations. These concerns would
have been justified, IMO, as Pettigrew only went back to Voldemort
when he was out of other options.
Also, Rookwood (I think it was he) testified in the Pensieve that the
identity of DEs was not generally known to other DEs. Thus, assuming
that the DEs operated on a kind of "cell" system, Snape may simply
have been in a different cell than the DEs in Azkaban. Even before
Sirius' "lapdog" remark, I pictured him as reporting to Lucius
Malfoy, and that Snape's task at the end of GoF related to Malfoy,
not Voldemort.
Potioncat:
> I've seen a very good post that suggests Snape actually
> came to DD witin days (or even hours) of the attack on the Potters.
I think it more likely that Snape came to Dumbledore a couple of
weeks before the attacks. We learn in PoA (don't have the book handy
or I'd quote) that the charm was put in place because one of
Dumbledore's spies tipped him off that Voldemort was after the
Potters, and that the attack occurred approximately one week after
the charm was performed.
Also, in light of all the canon developing the backstory relationship
between Snape and the Potters, I would be very surprised if
Dumbledore learned that Voldemort had targetted the Potters from
anyone other than Snape. (This may be how Dumbledore found out that
Voldemort had learned of the prophecy; Dumbledore quizzes Snape on
the contents of the prophecy to test his veracity and thereby learns
that Voldemort's knowledge is incomplete.)
It also seems very plausible that Snape's learning that the Potters
had been targeted for elimination was the catalyst that set in motion
his changing sides, another piece of circumstantial evidence pointing
to his joining Dumbledore within a couple weeks of the attack. I
think that he had been disaffected with the DEs long before he
approached Dumbledore. Snape is a very controlled person who does
not act randomly (irrationally, perhaps, but always with a purpose,
whether it's tormenting Harry and Neville in potions classes,
favoring the Slytherins, etc.)
I can't imagine that he would have approved of the DEs' taste for
purposeless Muggle killings, or of the kind of obsequiousness the DEs
were required to show toward Voldemort, and, probably, toward their
DE superiors. Continuing that relationship is a role that Snape must
play as a spy. I think he's been playing that role for the last 14
years, and that Snape's treatment of the Slytherins vs. his treatment
of Harry is a big part of that. However, it must be very
distasteful for him to continue a role he rejected when he left the
DEs. Therefore, Sirius' taunt that Snape was Lucius' lapdog must
have seemed particularly cruel to him, because it was both painful
and, at least at one level, true. To take up a point that Eloise
made on another thread, though, I have no doubt, however, that Snape
views Lucius as the lapdog.
Debbie
who is sorry to have rambled on so, but posts on Snape so rarely that
it seemed important to cram it all into one post
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive