Underage magic enforcement
Freeman, Louise Margaret
lfreeman at mbc.edu
Mon Mar 29 21:09:11 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 94458
>>And would Hermione have gotten a letter of warning from the Ministry
for practicing those first few spells at home?
Lionel<<
My guess is, underage magic rules are not enforced before the child gets
their Hogwarts letter, on the assumption that kids at that age are not
powerful enough to do much on their own and would (at least for wizard-born
children) get adequate supervision from their parents. Muggle-borns
presumably could not intentionally do magic until they know it exists, so
anything they did would be purely accidental, like Harry regrowing his hair
and freeing the snake. Otherwise, poor Neville's parents couldn't try to
force magic out of him by throwing him out windows, Ron couldn't have tried
to practice turning Scabbers yellow and Hermione couldn't have done her few
spells. The small kids flying on brooms, etc. at the World Cup got little
notice, even though ministry officials were everywhere.
After Hogwarts, underage magic seems to be comprable to underage drinking
enforcement in the US. Yes, it's technically against the law, but not
strictly monitored in private homes and generally left to parents and
schools to enforce. The MOM, for instance, didn't go after Harry and Ron for
flying the car, even though it was a serious offense viewed by Muggles; it
was left to their school and parents to discipline them. The MOM does not
seem to be monitoring every kid everywhere during the summer and citing them
for each little charm, just as our police don't haul every kid off to
juvenile hall who takes a sip of beer in their own home. Also, parents can
probably "authorize" their kids to do some limited types of magic in their
own home, just as parents can legally give their own underage children
alcohol. Intervention happens usually only in the most extreme situations
and typically only when there is a danger to others. A kid who starts hexing
muggles in the London Underground could get hauled in, while a kid doing a
charm in their own home is unlikely to.
Harry, of course, is the big exception. Both Dumbledore's people and the
MOM seem to be watching him like a hawk, at least from the start of CoS, at
first probably for his protection, later for other reasons. Hence the
instant responses and official warnings literally at the drop of a hat (or
the hovering of a pudding.) By OotP, once the MOM has launched its vendetta
against Harry, they are going to use every legal means (and some illegal)
against him. Hence the over-reaction (threats of immediate expulsion and
wand destruction) until Dumbledore reminded them of Harry's legal rights.
And the surprise of the OotP at the full hearing... it was the wizarding
world's equivalent full jury trial in adult court against a 15 year old who
took a sip of beer.
"Louise"
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive