Tyranny (WAS Harry learning from Snape)
Paula "Elanor Pam"
elanorpam at yahoo.com.br
Sun Oct 3 01:16:58 UTC 2004
No: HPFGUIDX 114530
> Ravenclaw Bookworm:
> And I absolutely DISagree with both Dzeytoun and Alla. Why is it
> alright for one person to "remake others" but not another
> - just because you agree with him? That's called tyranny.
> Which is exactly why Dumbledore won't do it.
>
>Dzeytoun:
>Sigh. Because that's the way life works, Bookworm. You don't lead
>by respecting other's right to act any way they want. If you are a
>manager, a general, or any other person in charge of a large scale
>and important task you squash disruptive behavior forthwith. Harsh,
>but truth almost always is. Snape has every right to think whatever
>he wants. He DOES NOT have every right to behave any way he wants.
>And his behavior has already resulted in one utter and absolute
>disaster.
This is a children's books, so Rowling is trying to teach the importance of
respecting other people's rights. If she wasn't, then it'd be understandable
for outraged teachers to burn her books, alright.
And I repeat: Dumbledore is NOT a manager, or a general, or a "person in
charge". As Headmaster of a school, he doesn't command the school or the
teachers or anything. He's more of a counsellor than anything else. And
there's a reason why he's rounded up the OotP instead of accepting the
invitation to be minister - that way, he can deal with the involved on a
personal level, instead of sitting on his high chair and giving orders. He
won't need to squash disruptive behavior, he'll sit and talk it through.
Elanor Pam
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive