Ship: R/Hr and violence (Re: The books are not about rape.)
phoenixgod2000
jmrazo at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 8 20:46:43 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 136971
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, "casmir2012" <casmir2012 at y...>
wrote:
> Casmir:
>
> I didn't find this scene abusive or funny.
phoenixgod2000: I personally do find the scene at least bullying, if
not truly abusive the way an adult would use the term. Ron was
covering his eyes with his hands for gods sake, hands that were
later covered by injuries. That certainly tells me that his eyes
could have been seriously damaged by the birds which is a bad
thing. Would you be as blase about the event if it had been Ron
sending birds after Hermione? I don't think anyone on this list
would be. There are levels of violence that people will accept from
women towards men that just aren't acceptable in reverse. Another
good example of that phenomena is the Ginny ramming Zack Smith
scene. Imagine if it had been Draco ramming Lee Jordan or worse yet,
Draco ramming a commentating female character. It would a far
different scene, but since Ginny did it, it must be funny.
> I agree with Luna that it shows that Hermione is human. IMO it
> externally shows the pain Hermione is feeling inside. Also, I
don't
> see it anymore "violent" then many of the jinxes performed on each
> other throughout the book.
I'm not sure that what bothers people is the act itself. Yes it
shows that Hermione is just a teenage girl and not pedestal!girl
that people like to think of her as. What bothers me, and I think
other people, was the lack of punishment. The other jinxes that that
hurled by students are usually punished by a teacher but, IIRC,
Hermione wasn't punished by anyone. I think that shows a tacit
agreement by the author which says that sort of action acceptable.
Ginny as well is rarely punished by anyone either.
Contrast that to Harry, who practically get punished for every
altercation he gets in, usually with a punishment far greater than
the crime.
It's also a reminder of Ron's dependance
> on Hermione to save his arse, as I doubt he knew how to get rid of
> the birds himself. I mean really, is it so violent to do that if a
> capable wizard is able to vanish the birds immediately? oh,
> yeah...Ron depends on Hermione to do that stuff for him.
Thats an unfair attack against Ron. She attacked him with magically
conjured constructs, something we haven't seen any other wizard do.
It certainly seems like upper level magic to me, and it wouldn't be
the first time Hermione went beyond her year when it came to
experimenting with spells. Just because Ron couldn't dispel the
birds doesn't mean he is incompetent. They could just be hard to get
rid of.
phoenixgod2000
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive