Opposite of Gryffindor?
David & Laura
cyclone_61032 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 28 22:33:19 UTC 2005
No: HPFGUIDX 125358
--- In HPforGrownups at yahoogroups.com, Arynn Octavia
<arynnoctavia at y...> wrote:
> I am extremely loyal, but not at all concerned with fair play. I'm
no Hufflepuff
>
>
> I am brave in certain situations, but not consistantly. I'm no
Gryffindor.
>
> I am intellegent and studious. I am a Ravenclaw.
>
> I am ambitious and perhaps a little Machiavellian. (Yes I can be
manipulative.) I am a Slytherin.
>
> So where would I go?
>
>
> --Arynn Octavia (A Lupin Lover)
David:
Well Arynn, you need to put the sorting hat on. As it announced in
the first book, it's never been wrong. It figures out where a
person 'belongs'.
You could argue that it sorts to a persons strongest trait. My own
theory is that, since the houses are to be the kid's families away
from home, the hat sorts a person where they can reach maximum
potential.
Picking on Hermione here, I agree with others that from an
intelligence/book smarts angle, Ravenclaw would seem the best fit.
The hat judged she needed to be in Gryff. I would say that was
exactly what she needed to be the Hermione we see today. If she had
been placed in Ravenclaw, would she not be just uni-dimensional into
her studies. Her experiences in Gryff, I would debate anyway, have
produced a much more rounded person; a lotta smarts...a little
bravado...a slight disregard for rules...sounds like a good
development to me.
Extending this theory a little further to Neville. On the surface he
does not seem the typical Gryffindor. I ask, would we see the
Neville we saw developing in OOTP, if he had been placed in
Hufflepuff. I don't think so.
Trust the hat!
David
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive