[HPforGrownups] Re: DD at the Dursleys: Why do people dislike the scene?
Magpie
belviso at attglobal.net
Sat Sep 9 02:29:50 UTC 2006
No: HPFGUIDX 158055
Snow:
Dumbledore was stuck with his decision and Harry's mistreatment. How can you
possibly deny Dumbledore a few subtle, reminders on this
visit, as to their continued rude behavior?
Magpie:
I don't deny it to him (or suggest he ought to be shot for being rude *looks
at other part of thread*). I just said I don't enjoy watching him do it,
and it makes me think less of him. I do agree with you that one's feelings
about a scene are often less than important, but in this case they are what
I was asked about. I don't think you can argue somebody out of their
emotional reaction to a scene. I understand other people have different
reactions and they just have to understand mine are different from theirs.
Snow:
These people or muggles don't even have the understanding that they have
done anything wrong in their eyes. Dumbledore was attempting to show them
that their abusive behavior has not ceased to exist and they still do not
recognize to what extent it remains to be so when he refers to Dudders.
Magpie:
That's another way the scene comes across differently to me. I read that
and just think, Didn't do much of a good job of showing them anything then.
He shows up, throws his weight around, does some scolding, says he wants
Harry to stay there a while longer and makes a reference to the way they
treat Dudley that confuses them all and then leaves. They're no more
different when he leaves than they were when they showed up--which perhaps
taps into another reason I don't enjoy these kinds of scenes with the
Dursleys, because their staying the same always seems to be important to the
scene. They're intentionally written as unchanging this way.
But I'm certainly not disagreeing that this is what Dumbledore is probably
doing in the scene in his eyes. I already see it the same way you do, so
explaining it to me isn't going to make me like the scene any better. I
think Dumbledore's a far better teacher and a far better everything else in
the Tower. That scene, imo, was Dumbledore at his best. This scene was
very off for me in reading it and I was glad to leave the Dursleys behind.
Snow:
As I have said, you are certainly entitled to apply your own emotions to any
scene in any of the books.
My point was that in doing so you may misinterpret the meaning of the given
scene that was intended by the author because of your own emotions.
Magpie:
Er...that sounds like it's somehow twisted what I said. There seems to be
no question of my misinterpreting anything in the scene, since we both agree
on what is going on in it. I don't think I've misinterpreted the author's
intention either. In the case of this particular scene I don't think my
emotional reaction was what the author was going for--we obviously have
different tastes on this kind of humor and I accepted that books ago! My
having a different emotional reaction to what she intended doesn't make me
or her wrong necessarily. An author can't dictate the emotional reaction of
a reader. Obviously I'm not her ideal reader for this scene, and she didn't
write it in a way that was going to get around my emotional resistance.
The reason I am talking about my emotions in this scene is because that's
specifically what I was asked about. I see exactly the same facts in the
scene as everyone else, I suspect the author's emotional reaction to the
scene is different from my own, and yet this is my reaction to it.
Snow:
I feel that, everyone, whether they realize it or not bases their opinions
from their own point of view based on their emotions and mental awareness of
their past experiences. People sometimes can't help but to become connected
with a particular scene because it may trigger a part of their own
experience.
Magpie:
Absolutely. That's what I'm referring to in describing why I don't like
what DD is doing--if pressed I could probably come up with negative memories
it reminded me of. Plus there's the Muggle thing talked about elsewhere,
just a lot of things. Similarly there are other scenes that don't bother me
or I find funny that other people are enraged by. JKR's books kind of lend
themselves to that, imo. For all the talk I sometimes hear in fandom about
how we're supposed to react to scenes and who we're supposed to like, she
actually seems really good at creating ambiguous scenes tailor made for
controversy when you get more than one person reading them.
Snow:
This is exactly where I attempt to become objective to the point of
excluding my own emotions so I don't cloud my vision of the actual events
that are going on.
Magpie:
I think we're both doing a pretty good job about being objective about the
facts of the scene. At least I haven't been aware of any differences in
what we think is happening. It's not like you think Dumbledore comes to the
house to bring the Dursleys a present and I think he's come to poison them.
One of the things the books do really well, imo, is have different people
respond to things differently. James Potter: Great guy or total berk?
Sirius thinks the first, Snape thinks the second, and neither of them is
just wrong.
Snow:
I believe I have already answered this but then again there's that whole
Internet in-clarity I spoke of at the beginning of this post. I will answer
again, since you asked twice what I didn't like.I will reluctantly elaborate
but it has no bearing on the story.
Magpie:
Just to be clear, I know it has no bearing on the story. I didn't answer
the thread right away because it was a thread about our different emotional
reactions, which is subjective, to a scene and not something that was more
objective, like what happens in the scene.
Snow:
I am not Holier-than-though and would have to protect a child to the nth
degree, so given the logistics that Dumbledore could not totally prevent
Harry's abuse (as I see it) once his initial decision had been invoked, I
would have been more than severe (in this scene) when I finally had my final
conversation with the very persons who I entrusted to care for Harry.
In short, Dumbledore didn't do enough convincing in this last scene to make
me proud But (discounting my person emotions) I can also appreciate that
Dumbledore is a Holier-than-though-type-of-person and could not stoop to the
level I would have gone less he become as abusive as the Dursley's
themselves. (you can't teach a child not to hit by hitting them)
Magpie:
Just to be clear, when you say a "holier than thou" person you mean that
sincerely? Like, you're saying that Dumbledore actually is more saint-like
or forgiving rather than the way the phrase is usually used? Because
calling someone holier than thou usually means you're calling them
hypocritically pious or sanctimonious and it doesn't seem like you're
accusing Dumbledore of that.
Your own emotional response to the scene doesn't change the facts of it, I
agree, and nor does mine, but it does seem to explain why we'd be moved to
speak up, doesn't it? I mean, I don't like what Dumbledore's doing because
I think it's beneath him and you would have prefered to see a little more of
it. So while we both agree about what's going on in the scene our different
reactions can easily feel like they can't co-exist with each other.
Snow:
If (big if) this scene irritated me at all that would be why but then it's
not my story and I do accept and appreciate what I previously have said that
Dumbledore would be stooping to the Dursley's
stupidity and ignorance if he had done any more than what he did.
Magpie:
Sure--I accept the scene too. And I appreciate that Dumbledore's supposed
to be showing anger here over the mistreatment of a child. It's just never
going to be a favorite of mine to read.
Alla:
That's funny. I thought in the quote you briefly mention yourself Petunia as
much as tells us that she **was** jealous of Lily.
But here it is:
""Knew!" shrieked Aunt Petunia suddenly. "Knew! Of course we knew! How could
you not be, my dratted sister being what she was? Oh, she got a letter just
like that and disappeared off to that-that school-
and came home every vacation with her pockets full of frog spawn, turning
teacups into rats. I was the only one who saw her for what she was-a freak!
But for my mother and father, oh no, it was Lily this and Lily that, they
were proud of having a witch in the family!"
She stopped to draw a deep breath and then went ranting on. It seemed she
had been wanting to say all this for years."Then she met that Potter at
school and they left and got married and had you, and of course I knew you'd
be just the same, just as strange, just as-as-abnormal-and then, if you
please, she went and
got herself blown up and we got landed with you!"" - PS/SS, chapter 4.
Alla:
I don't know - to me it **so** screams of jealousy, because her parents were
so proud to have witch in the family. IMO of course.
And of course Petunia already loved her so much that she called her a freak.
I wonder how much she really loved her.
Magpie:
I wrote an essay on this once.:-) Basically, the way I see Petunia--and
this is a lot to do with one small way in which I identify with her--I think
she did love Lily, yes. That is, they had a normal, if imperfect, sister
relationship until Hogwarts. A lot of my imaginings about those early years
are obviously not canon at all, so they can't be taken as proof of anything,
but I much prefer seeing Petunia as a real person who had real hurt over
this issue instead of just the wicked stepsister who was ugly and didn't
have magic powers and was always jealous and hated perfect Lily. Not
because it makes Petunia's behavior towards Harry any better, but it's more
realistic to me. Also--and I think JKR illustrates this well in canon a
lot--real hurt breeds deeper bitterness and so more cruelty. She was
jealous, I think, but to me it's not just in a superficial way.
Granted my view of Petunia does slot in consistently to the way I see the
two worlds in general and all that, but it makes me like Petunia as a
character more, so I'm happy with it.:-)
-m
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive