GoF fight between Harry and Ron/On perfection of moral virtues
pippin_999
foxmoth at qnet.com
Fri May 18 16:07:01 UTC 2007
No: HPFGUIDX 168932
> Alla:
>
> Oh. Harry **lied** to Ron now? He did not tell him everything that
> happened, that's for sure.
Pippin:
"Listen," said Harry. "I didn't put my name in that goblet. Someone
else must've done it."
Ron raised his eyebrows.
"What would they do that for?"
"I dunno," said Harry. He felt it would sound very melodramatic
to say, "To kill me."
--GoF ch 17
Harry thinks he *does* know. He says he doesn't. He's not
hiding the truth from a curious stranger, he's hiding it from
his best friend, and not even giving him a reason for it.
When Dumbledore hid the prophecy from Harry he gave his
honest reason for it: Harry was too young. Dumbledore
also hid other information that he thought Harry
would not need to know. For example, Harry would not
have needed to know about horcruxes if Voldemort made
only one and it had been destroyed. He would not need to
know that Draco was planning to murder Dumbledore if
Draco was in fact incapable of murder. He would not need to
know that Snape was the eavesdropper if Snape had been
granted amnesty.
But if Harry thought Ron didn't need to know why someone
had put Harry's name in the goblet or that knowing this would
endanger Ron, then he should've been happy that Ron got
the wrong end of the stick. But he wasn't. He withheld
his faith from Ron and still expected Ron to have faith in him.
That wasn't fair.
Pippin
More information about the HPforGrownups
archive